| Summary: | ARM: runnable/test11.d Unsupported platform | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | GDC | Reporter: | Johannes Pfau <johannespfau> |
| Component: | gdc | Assignee: | Johannes Pfau <johannespfau> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | trivial | CC: | ibuclaw, johannespfau |
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | development | ||
| Hardware: | ARM | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
Yep, it should be D_LP64. Raise it upstream. Alexrp should agree with me. :^) Fixed upstream in dmd 2.061 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/375855698cd4de3c74f9840941daf37b9ae36dcf |
This test is currently failing: ---- byte* p; version(X86) assert(p.sizeof == 4); else version(X86_64) assert(p.sizeof == 8); else assert(false, "unknown platform"); ---- we could of course just add a ---- else version(ARM) assert(p.sizeof == 4); ---- but I wonder whether this should use D_LP64 instead? With armv8/AArch64 arm will support 64bit pointers. The question then is whether we introduce a new version for 64 bit version(ARM64), or whether version(ARM) could be 32 or 64 bit and we should additionally use version(D_LP64)?